The Ancient Christian Tapestry: A Plea to Roman Catholics

Kurelek's Manitoba Party

Many years ago, when I was living in Montreal, I attended a very beautiful Anglican Church in the heart of the city. This particular church was very popular among a host of groups, and particularly certain types of Roman Catholics who passed through by way of taking shelter from the appalling disregard for the sacred they had experienced in their own parishes. These were thoughtful people on the whole, who could well articulate what it was they felt they had lost in the post-conciliar Roman Catholic Church, and not ‘merely’ aesthetic things either. In fact, there was one ecclesiastical refugee who had written a great deal on the loss of the ancient propers and lectionary of the Western Church to the bland platitudes of the then-translation of the new Missal and its concomitant three-year Sunday, two-year weekday athematic tour through Scripture. I mention this, though, not to make digs at some of the more unfortunate aspects of post-conciliar liturgical reform, but to lay the groundwork for a more important point. For I learnt something at that Anglican parish I will never forget: to a Roman Catholic woman who came by the parish one day as a stop on her spiritual journey, the Anglican parish priest said, ‘you may certainly come here on your way back to the Church, but this is not your home, and you must eventually return to your Mother, the Catholic Church’.

The great lesson in this for me was in learning that people had their own, proper spiritual homes. An Italian Roman Catholic so born and raised, for example, unless he had some kind of authentic spiritual experience that led him to a new place, would not belong in a non-Roman Catholic Church (and certainly not in a Protestant community!). So it came to really bother me, when, as Anglican myself, my Protestant brethren accepted Catholics into their midst without sending them straight back to their rightful Christian family, and I made it my own practice to inform any Orthodox or Catholic person who, for whatever reason, joined my parish for a service even once, that they were not to get too comfortable, for they had their own Church with which to reconcile.

Now, I proffer this by way of analogy only, for the real issue at hand is not an issue of Catholic or Orthodox versus Protestant, but rather ancient, Eastern Christian, versus Roman Catholic.

I have often called my Roman Catholic brethren the Americans of the Church: they mean well, but they are simply so numerous and their ideas so prevalent on the intellectual landscape that they hardly notice anyone else and frequently step on others’ feet. As a result, I am never surprised when my own, Ukrainian Greek Catholic, Church gets described as ‘not proper Catholic’, or Orthodoxy as some kind of exotic, incomprehensible Protestantism. On a personal level, actually, I am deeply fortunate in terms of my relations with the local Roman Catholic archdiocese, insofar as the archbishop has been nothing short of encouraging both of me and of my small parish; yet across the country more generally, it is clear that in the absence of glittering onion domes to stimulate their curiosity, the Eastern Churches are not something average Roman Catholics – lay or ordained – have entertained as a reality warranting any attention.

The reason this is of concern brings me back to my initial story. Modern Britain is a cosmopolitan place. The United Kingdom plays host to countless cultures from around the world, some of which have no more connection to the Roman Catholic Church than a Samoan woman might to America because her country hosts a McDonald’s. They may be Christians of an ancient tradition, but unfortunately, those who already inhabit the country to which our newcomers have just come will never know, as the people with funny accents will quickly become absorbed into the dominant Church with nary a question asked.

We see in Scripture that human traditions are of intrinsic value. In fact, they are more, hallowed as they are by God the Word having taken them upon himself as part of his recapitulative service. Human traditions, be they linguistic, artistic, culinary, or religious, stand alongside other facets of humanity’s physical substance as things that have been given new meaning. And if this is so, then it follows that when human beings leave the land that has nurtured those traditions, carrying them with them, then we in the Church have a responsibility to recognise and encourage both the people and their cultural and spiritual treasures when they arrive amongst us.

In ecclesiastical terms, I would think the best way to do this is by pointing such people in the direction of the Church that most closely corresponds to their original tradition. (Read: Eastern Christians to an Eastern Church.) Unfortunately, however, many of our more vulnerable communities – communities that need protection and encouragement – are precisely those that get overlooked. I have come across numerous families whose origins lie in the Middle East, and whose traditions span Melkite to Maronite to Chaldean to Syrian Orthodox, yet who have been absorbed into a Roman Catholic Church, and whom everyone just assumed were meant to be there. Unfortunately, though, research suggests that when you separate a group from their traditions, they lose not only their traditions, but their faith as well, within a single generation.

When my old Anglican parish priest told a Roman Catholic that she had to return to her true alma mater, he did something brave, if necessary, and profoundly charitable. He not only stopped a Catholic from becoming separated from the Church; he saved her from a loss of personal cultural identity, and he saved the world from losing another French-Canadian Roman Catholic (no jokes, please). In response, I submit that it is incumbent on every British parish priest today to do likewise with the Lebanese, Indians, Romanians, Ukrainians, Greeks… whoever it is that has joined a community that is not naturally their own. At the very least, it would be helpful for all concerned if the passive drifting of one person or family into the Latin Rite was challenged by a well-considered and well-directed pastoral question. Then, if the person concerned has had a genuine conversion experience, she can be left alone; but if she has simply sought to become part of the British mainstream, or worse, merely slipped in quietly while no one was looking and gotten used to having lost her inheritance, then she should be pointed in the direction of her natural spiritual home.

The Church, after all, is like a tapestry: it is made up of many distinct and beautiful threads reflecting many traditions. There may be a dominant colour, but in the absence of all the other threads, the tapestry would be irreparably diminished. It seems to be that, in this cosmopolitan world, threads are woven into parts of the tapestry they had not been before, and we can respond in one of two ways. We can either overwhelm the isolated, dislocated thread with the dominant surrounding colour and so render it invisible, or we can draw it together with other similar-coloured threads in the section and watch as, combined, they add something altogether new to the tapestry.

As a priest of a small, but growing, Ukrainian Church in a region predominantly made up of Roman Catholics of Irish background, I would like to offer a home – or at least some support – to the many Christians from Eastern Church traditions that have immigrated here over the last century. My interest in this regard is the Church’s interest, which is that all her children should be nurtured in a spiritual language they understand. For this to happen, though, my brother priests in the Latin Church need to recognise when there are sojourners in their midst that may not belong there, to remember that there is more to the Church than the Latin tradition, then to urge such folk in a suitable direction. The same is true globally. To this end, I would make a plea to all Roman Catholics to learn more about the sister Churches in their own communion, as well as the Orthodox Churches that Rome recognises as such, and to be attentive to the fact that in our contemporary world there will be many who should be availing themselves of these Churches’ ministry.

A failure to come to terms with the broader nature of the Church – aside from the historical implications this entails – would also stand to endanger the faith of countless people who have already made the brave decision to leave their homeland in search of a new one. It certainly endangers their culture. And in the end, what endangers both culture and faith can only serve to bleach the tapestry, leaving it but a pale souvenir of what the Holy Spirit ignited at Pentecost.

Advertisements

5 responses to “The Ancient Christian Tapestry: A Plea to Roman Catholics

  1. So, if a Roman Catholic comes to you seeking to join your Church do you send them back?

    Surely you couldn’t send a protestant back to error?

    • Protestants generally emerge from the Latin tradition, so I encourage them to connect with their own cultural and religious heritage within the Latin (Roman) Catholic Church.

      As for Romans who seek to join my Church, no, I do not send them back unless it seems pastorally appropriate. As I try to make clear in my article, there can be very legitimate spiritual reasons for someone to seek out the Faith in a community that does not necessarily cohere with one’s ethnic/spiritual background. That said, there is a far greater likelihood of a Ukrainian Greek Catholic ‘disappearing’ into the Roman Catholic Church and losing their inherited identity than there is an Irish Roman Catholic ‘disappearing’ into the Ukrainian Church.

      Part of what I suggest is based on the idea of minority communities being in a dangerous position by virtue of their minority status.

      In any case, I do not wish to advocate any hard and fast rules. It is simply vital, I think, that the legitimacy and importance of the multifaceted Catholic/Orthodox Tradition be recognised and encouraged.

  2. That makes sense. Thank you.
    Could I just ask what would constitute being ‘pastorally appropriate’, and what would be a ‘legitimate reason’?

    • Two examples of ‘pastorally appropriate’ come to mind:

      1. POSITIVE. A Roman Catholic has read Dostoyevsky, and encountered Eastern traditions for the first time. For some people, this might just be an enthralling and spiritually enriching experience before moving on; for our subject, though, it is like a fire has been lit. He moves on to read ‘The Way of the Pilgrim’, followed by other works of Eastern spirituality and theology. Eventually, he feels like the Eastern Church offers him something he deeply desires, and so seeks to move into the Eastern Church.

      2. NEGATIVE. A Latin Catholic may feel dispossessed of his traditional inheritance, and by going to an Eastern Catholic Church, that he can remain in communion with the See of Rome and the ancient traditions he loves, while finding some of what he is missing.

      Both situations, I think, are entirely legitimate, as in both, the subject is motivated by love and a desire to interact more deeply with the Church. This may be more obvious in the first example, but having encountered the second situation on many occasions, it is possible to *feel* when the subject is simply (and unhelpfully) ‘on the run’, as opposed to when he has truly made the decision to incarnate as an Eastern Catholic, and truly enter into the spirit of that Church.

      Bear in mind, of course, that these are hypothetical examples only, and that no brief description will ever cover the depth of a single person’s experience. Whatever the cause for an individual’s ecclesiastical move among or within the ancient Churches, I would always uphold the idea that the fullness of beauty and truth properly belongs to each, and that it is subjective need of the human soul that warrants such concessions.

      I hope this all makes sense.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s