Taking Licence From Pope Francis I

ImageOnly a few weeks into the pontificate of Francis I, and traditional Catholics are being challenged like they haven’t been before. Or at least since the pontificate of Paul VI and the advent of the Novus Ordo Missae.

Indeed, this year the new pope chose not to do as his predecessors had done and celebrate the Mass of Holy Thursday in the Lateran Archbasilica; instead celebrating it in a youth detention centre, during which he washed and kissed the feet of twelve young people, including women and Muslims.

Now, however we might feel about this act, that it breaks both with tradition and law is beyond dispute. Fr Ray Blake offers some words on the matter that bear consideration, but what the entire Church needs to call to mind now is that, whatever Pope Francis might do over the course of his ministry, and whatever lessons he might offer the Church, what he says and does is only valid inasmuch as it is consistent with Holy Tradition.

I have the privilege of holding a faculty to celebrate the Roman Rite, which I do on a regular basis because of where I work during the week. Thus far, I have celebrated the Novus Ordo only, but have done so in obedience to the episcopal decree which permits me celebrate the rites of the Latin Church so long as I continue to live according the norms of my own (Byzantine) Rite, and that when I do celebrate the Latin Rite, I do so in conformity with its rubrics, without ritual confusion. As a result, I take what the Missal says very literally, and it clearly suggests that the priest should be facing ad orientum when offering the Holy Sacrifice. I know, of course, that many Latin priests do not face this way when celebrating, but I do not feel that I have the right to pick and choose which details I shall observe of a Rite that is not my own, and furthermore, find it more liturgically consistent when moving between the Byzantine liturgical world, and the Latin, to approach the Altar from the same direction.

For all this, it came to my attention yesterday that a priest in the Latin diocese in which I reside was told about the way I celebrate, to which he replied somewhat derisively, ‘Pope Francis wouldn’t do that.’

Frankly, whether the new pope would or would not face the liturgical East when celebrating Mass is beside the point. In fact, I rather suspect this diocesan priest was right: Pope Francis would not do that. More important, though, is the fact that it doesn’t matter.

As Francis I has reminded us, he is the Bishop of Rome, and so pope. As pope, he has the great responsibility of summarising Holy Tradition when he speaks to the Church, and when he does so, he speaks infallibly. Certainly the former Cardinal Ratzinger thought so when he declared of Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, that it “requires definitive assent, since, founded on the written word of God, and from the beginning constantly preserved and applied in the tradition of the church, it has been set forth infallibly by the ordinary and universal magisterium” [emphasis mine]. That being the case, it would be ridiculous to place too much weight on the liturgical example of Pope Francis when his papacy has so obviously signalled that it would not be making the Liturgy and the recovery of liturgical tradition its focus.

The fact remains that, although Pope Benedict XVI has retired, his teaching remains just a relevant as it was when he was at the height of his strength. Pope Benedict reminded us all that it is in fidelity to our traditions, and most importantly to Holy Tradition of Mother Church, that the world will be successfully re-evangelised. If we lose sight of this, then we go about the work of the Church at our peril.

Pope Francis, too, has something to say about evangelisation, and it is a lesson we can all stand to hear. But to suggest for one moment that, because this pope – formed as he was in his vocation by the Jesuits, in Latin America, in the aftermath of the Second Vatican Council – shows little interest in liturgical theology, the teaching of the last pope has been superceded and we all have carte blanche to dig out the rainbow-coloured broad stoles, disobey rubrics, and re-cast Tradition in our own image, is patently absurd and utterly naive. It is tantamount to saying, when the next popImagee comes along and moves back into the papal apartments, that we don’t have to ‘do humility’ anymore.

Technically, I could say that I do not have a horse in the Latin liturgical race; but the fact is I do. (Frankly, anyone who cares about culture, and beauty, and goodness – not to mention the worthy worship of the Holy Trinity – should.) Regardless, though, no Catholic should be hoodwinked into thinking that their rightful inheritance has been shelved or somehow done away with because a new pope with new lessons has come along. There would have been nothing discordant with a Mass celebrated ad orientum in the detention centre, with incense, chanting, and worthy priestly vesture. Alas, that may not have been what happened, but if Catholics are genuinely in communion with the whole Church in space and time, then they will understand that the teaching of both popes is what should inform them now, and go out to meet the poor, sharing with them as much beauty and mystery and cultural treasure as they can.


10 responses to “Taking Licence From Pope Francis I

  1. who do you think you are!
    so what if he changes it its better this way its not a reincarnation but a representation! also Christ would have washed his mothers feet and Mary of Magdalas feet also don’t discriminate LOVE thats what Christ called us to do!
    On the other hand i feel if he is going to change things then he should change the rubrics stating that you can wash womens or mens feet.

    Now this is the Pope, chosen by the Holy Spirit to guide and shepherd Holy Mother Church in the way that God wishes. We have to listen to him and maybe you should spend more time listening to his words than commenting on his actions! Maybe then you to would be filled with Gods love and Holy Spirit so that you too would be too busy to write a blog. All the priests i know are far to busy helping people to write blogs but there you go!

    • I fear, meronsque, that you have completely and utterly misunderstood what I have written. As you reconsider your words, you may also wish to expand your understanding of the word ‘love’. It means something much greater than the mere, visible inclusion of minorities in ancient liturgies. Afterall, the very Incarnation of Love Himself threw out the money changers.

  2. Thank you for striking all the right notes here. You put it very well indeed: “it doesn’t matter.” (People need to stop watching the pope so obsessively if it causes a collective meltdown.) But also: anyone who cares about liturgy, culture, and tradition cannot be totally indifferent to these developments.

  3. “There is nothing in the Council text (VII) about turing towards the people” – Cardinal Ratzinger writing in the Preface of “Turing Towards the Lord” by Fr Uwe Lang. It’s interesting the comment you received about what Pope Francis would do. Would they have said the same thing about Pope Benedict and facing East, a few years ago?

    • Good point, PJ! This also applies to receiving Communion kneeling and on the tongue! It came to be the only way that Pope Benedict gave Communion.

  4. Thanks for your comment and question. If you are referring to Pope Benedict’s celebrations of the Mass in St Peter’s, then you should know that he was indeed facing East, as are all celebrants who stand at the Altar there. Due to the fact that St Peter’s simply replaces a previous Roman Basilica, which was built so that the rising sun would stream in the West door and illumine the visage of the Emperor, when a Pope (or anyone) celebrates Mass, he is facing the rising sun, and so… East. The former Josef Ratzinger wrote about the theological and spiritual importance of facing East in his work, ‘The Spirit of the Liturgy’. If you haven’t read it, may I suggest that you will find it at once enlightening and invigorating?

    • Thank you for your explanation, Fr. I’m sorry, I think I was confused when I watched the masses in St Peter’s. Perhaps it was the angle of the camera but I was convinced that the altar had been facing the congregation (perhaps because I am used to east facing altars being right up against the wall?). Anyway, now you have cleared that up for me.

      Thank you for this recommendation also. I will note it down and make every effort to read it in the near future. I have so much to learn!

  5. Dear Father: Adam DeVille thanks you for the tone of your posting and I suppose that for him it struck a chord. For me it struck a dis-chord in that I am too prone, I expect, to reading between the lines and what I read between the lines of your post is not entirely harmonious. Perhaps you intend to have that tension there and leave it there. If that is the case then I am in accord if not in a chord with you. The letter of the law is always held in tension by the Spirit of the law, and if we are to believe yet a third pope, Blessed John Paul the Second, in the introduction to the current code of canons then the code is not above the Spirit of the Law. That will always force us to manage the anxiety of prudential judgment.

    In the Risen Christ!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s